Back from VSS — thanks for all the good feedback

As everyone is busy writing manuscripts only two of us—Alex and Martin—made it to the annual Vision Sciences Society Meeting in St. Pete Beach, Florida, this year. But the two of us had a productive and inspiring time. Alex and Martin presented a poster on the correlates of visual awareness in microsaccadic inhibition. The resonance was very positive and we’re grateful for a ton of helpful feedback. Look out for our manuscript on the data, to be submitted very soon. Here’s our abstract:

26.3017 A common cortical detection mechanism for perception and movement
Alex White & Martin Rolfs

Visual input is shared by many perceptual, cognitive, and motor functions. We can study the architecture of the brain by determining when these streams of sensory processing diverge. We took this approach to investigate two fundamental perceptual and motor functions: visual detection and microsaccadic inhibition. Microsaccades are small, spontaneous eye movements that occur during attempted fixation. They are briefly and reflexively inhibited following the onset of a visual stimulus. Does microsaccadic inhibition rely on the same detection mechanisms as conscious perception, or an independent, possibly subcortical processing stream? Observers fixated a small point and detected a Gabor stimulus flashed briefly on a random half of trials. We measured perceptual sensitivity (d’), and oculomotor sensitivity for the same stimulus, derived from the drop in microsaccade rates following stimulus onset. In a first experiment, we found that foveal contrast thresholds for perceptual and oculomotor responses were very similar. In fact, microsaccades were inhibited if and only if the observer reported seeing a stimulus, even when no stimulus was present. This finding suggests a strong link between perception and oculomotor control: they share a source of internal noise. We then used orientation-specific adaptation to determine whether the signal triggering microsaccadic inhibition goes through visual cortex. In two experiments using foveal and peripheral targets, respectively, each trial began with several seconds of adaptation to a flickering grating. The target Gabor, flashed after the adaptor on 50% of trials, either had the same (adapted) or the orthogonal (unadapted) orientation. Consistent with classic phenomena known to rely on orientation-selective cortical neurons, perceptual sensitivity was reduced for the adapted orientation. Oculomotor sensitivity followed the same pattern: microsaccadic inhibition was less pronounced for the adapted than the orthogonal orientation. We conclude that even the most reflexive oculomotor responses rely on the same cortical detection mechanisms as perception.

Acknowledgement: Emmy Noether program of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (RO 3579/2-1)

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s